Howard M. Cooper brings nearly four decades of experience litigating complex civil and criminal disputes as well as significant civil rights and First Amendment cases for clients across New England and around the country. His record of success in obtaining favorable results in the courtroom and in alternative dispute resolution forums has earned him the reputation as a “go to” attorney for high-stakes, high-profile matters. A tireless advocate for his clients, he prides himself on providing hands-on attention to every matter and on being relentlessly responsive and thoroughly prepared.
Since forming Todd & Weld in 1992, Howard has represented a diverse cross-section of businesses, organizations and individuals ranging from health care, religious, retail, education and tribal entities to judges, politicians, physicians, executives, and public figures. He regularly represents plaintiffs and defendants in federal and state trial and appeal courts, in arbitration proceedings and before licensure boards. His approach, which combines practicality, creativity and integrity, always begins with preparing every case for the potential of trial.
Drawing from his deep experience in civil litigation and criminal defense, Howard effectively advises clients when cases involve the interplay of criminal prosecution and civil liability — a situation that occurs frequently. By taking a 360-degree view of these matters, he helps clients understand their potential risks and claims.
Many of Howard’s wins, which include obtaining multimillion-dollar jury verdicts for his clients and establishing new legal precedents, have attracted widespread regional and national attention. Most recently, as lead trial counsel he secured a $16.4 million state Superior Court jury verdict following a 15-day trial on behalf of a major health care provider in a business dispute against a medical practice. The verdict is one of the largest in Massachusetts in 2022. His successful defense of a doctor in an eight-week trial in federal court prompted an editorial in The Wall Street Journal decrying governmental overreach in using vague federal drug laws to prosecute physicians. Howard also prevailed for a prominent Massachusetts judge in a landmark public figure defamation case that underscored the independence of the judiciary.
As head of Todd & Weld’s pro bono program, Howard has advanced the firm’s long-standing commitment to helping those in need obtain top-flight representation. Sought-after for insights and commentary on timely legal issues, Howard is frequently quoted in articles appearing in legal journals, business publications and general interest media. He has been recognized for excellence by Best Lawyers in America, Benchmark Litigation and Super Lawyers and holds Martindale-Hubbell’s AV-Preeminent ranking.
Obtained a dismissal of all criminal charges against his clients in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts involving "double-breasted" businesses and contributions to a pension fund. In a highly unusual outcome, the government agreed to dismiss all embezzlement and mail fraud charges involving the firm's clients, a New Hampshire-based asbestos removal company and its owner. The case involved complex issues as to whether a non-union employer that operates a so-called "double-breasted" business, where the non-union company is paired with a union company, is obligated to make pension fund contributions to the Massachusetts Laborers Benefits Funds in certain circumstances.
Obtained a federal jury acquittal of a medical doctor on all eight counts of alleged violations of federal drug distribution laws and conspiracy. The doctor, Joseph P. Zolot, was a Needham, Mass.-based pain medicine physician whose office was raided by the government, after which he was indicted on multiple counts of unlawfully prescribing opioids such as OxyContin, Fentanyl and Methadone to patients. A first trial ended in a hung jury. The U.S. Attorney’s Office decided to retry the case, which resulted in the jury acquittal following 26 days of trial and 23 hours of deliberation.
Successfully defended Judge Leon Kendall against criminal contempt charges alleging that he had obstructed justice and disobeyed an order of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court in refusing to preside over a first-degree murder trial after discovering gross prosecutorial misconduct. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a case of first impression, exonerated Judge Kendall on all charges. In Re: The Honorable Leon Kendall, No. 11-4471 (2013).
In a widely reported case, obtained a $2.1 million jury verdict on behalf of Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Ernest Murphy against The Boston Herald. The decision has been hailed nationally as a landmark public figure defamation case important to the independence of the judiciary. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld the jury verdict in favor of the judge. Murphy v. Herald, 449 Mass. 42, 865 N.E.2d 746 (2007). In its unanimous decision, the SJC commented that, because of Mr. Cooper's cross-examination of the Herald reporter who wrote the stories about Judge Murphy, the reporter's credibility at trial was left “in tatters.”
Facilitated the settlement of a highly publicized, contentious dispute involving his client the Islamic Society of Greater Worcester and the Town of Dudley over the siting of an Islamic cemetery in that town.
Successfully represented a Boston-area Islamic group in connection with their building of a mosque and cultural center in Roxbury, Mass. Post 9/11, the group came under attack from Islamophobic organizations. Mr. Cooper's representation of the Muslim community in that case has been widely described as courageous. He received an award presented by Boston-area Muslims thanking him for his commitment to civil rights and religious freedom.
As lead trial counsel, obtained a $16.4 million jury verdict following a 15-day trial on behalf of a major health care provider in a business dispute against a medical practice. The verdict was one of the largest in Massachusetts in 2022.
Persuaded a Massachusetts Superior Court judge to grant a preliminary injunction to their clients in a shareholder dispute involving control of a medical cannabis dispensary and cultivation company.
Persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to reject the argument of defendants that the America Invents Act overrides a bar to appellate review of a remand order to state court. The precedential ruling defines the limits of appellate review of a remand order related to patent counterclaims.
Obtained the first known ruling in Massachusetts applying the Commonwealth's breach of contract statute of limitations despite a choice-of-law provision in a corporate operating agreement stating that Delaware law controls all disputes related to the agreement.
Persuaded federal court judge to dismiss a class action complaint filed by several former Mount Ida College students arising from the college’s closure in 2018.
Boston University School of Law (J.D., magna cum laude, 1984) Case and Note Editor, American Journal of Law and Medicine, 1983-1984; Liacos Distinguished Scholar, Hennessey Distinguished Scholar, Tauro Distinguished Scholar
Union College (B.A., summa cum laude, 1981) Phi Beta Kappa, Pi Sigma Alpha, Idol Prize for Creative Writing, Yudis Prize for Creative Writing, Stanley Becker Scholarship Recipient